![]() |
|
[split] VMS - a forgery? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: [split] VMS - a forgery? (/thread-1300.html) Pages:
1
2
|
[split] VMS - a forgery? - bunny - 14-12-2016 (14-12-2016, 06:24 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote pid='9755' dateline='1481674532'] [/quote] There is nothing that suggests to me it is factually a C15th manuscript in content and the language would be more modern. Of all the languages people have looked at in modern times they do seem to find contemporaneous word structure, again something I will be looking at in my hypothesis. Bunny RE: Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r - -JKP- - 14-12-2016 RE: Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r - bunny - 15-12-2016 RE: Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r - -JKP- - 15-12-2016 RE: Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r - bunny - 15-12-2016 RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - ThomasCoon - 15-12-2016 RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - ReneZ - 15-12-2016 RE: Lament from the Sea, New Method! f2r - -JKP- - 16-12-2016 RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - stellar - 16-12-2016 RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - bunny - 17-12-2016 |