![]() |
|
Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? (/thread-1970.html) |
Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - MarcoP - 24-06-2017 Voynich You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. feature marginal illustrations and a mix of Voynichese and words written in the Latin alphabet. I think these two small sets of marginalia belong together, i.e. they are too similar to be unrelated. D'Imperio wrote: “There are small drawings of people, animals, and other less easily-identifiable objects on some pages. Folio 66r, as has already been noted, contains a drawing of a man lying on his back clutching his stomach as if sick or dead, and surrounded by various indeterminate small objects. The last page, 116v, has several sketches of people, animals, and other mysterious shapes in its upper left corner”. (I guess she mistook the figure in 66r as a man because she only had poor quality reproductions of the illustrations) In my opinion, the two illustrations represent two “patients,” together with the substances to be used to cure them. I guess this interpretation is widely seen as the most likely, but I would like to know what others think. In particular, I would be interested in different interpretations of the two sets of illustrations and corresponding visual parallels. Here are a few illustrations that I consider relevant to the subject:
A point for which I have no explanation is why the two marginal figures are both women (while, in most of the examples I have seen, the patients are men). Since female figures are prominent in the whole manuscript, I doubt this is a coincidence. RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - Helmut Winkler - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - MarcoP - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - bi3mw - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - Koen G - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - MarcoP - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - VViews - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - -JKP- - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - Helmut Winkler - 24-06-2017 RE: Are the illustrations in 66r and 116v related? - Helmut Winkler - 24-06-2017 |