![]() |
|
A case for Gibberish - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: A case for Gibberish (/thread-3366.html) |
A case for Gibberish - Voynichgibberish - 24-09-2020 A case for Gibberish and no one should suffer anymore by the hands of the Voynich Author
![]() Anyone reading this please have mercy on me for passing any judgments upon the Voynich Manuscript, as I know this is a contentious topic for everyone involved. Over the years I've looked at the manuscript's text searching for any meaning whatsoever. I have run dozens of frequency analysis on several languages and compared it to the Voynich Manuscript to no avail. I even compared it to classical and modern ciphers and I could not fetter out a rational input and output cipher with languages which resembled normalcy of its kind. The output just became garbled so to speak. Lastly I began to think this was a created language and it only held meaning to the owner or a group, but that's when I woke up after reading the Random Walk Pdf by Schinner. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. Here is some bullet points to ponder before going down the path of a literal translation of the VMS:
![]() RE: A case for Gibberish - Mark Knowles - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - -JKP- - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - Voynichgibberish - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - -JKP- - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - Voynichgibberish - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - ReneZ - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - MarcoP - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - Mark Knowles - 24-09-2020 RE: A case for Gibberish - Mark Knowles - 24-09-2020 |