![]() |
|
Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) (/thread-4389.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - Koen G - 20-10-2024 It looks like Stolfi leaned towards seeing EVA-m and g as shortened versions of in-clusters. To me this feels right intuitively. But I wonder, has anyone looked into this further? Are there any objections or better solutions? For reference, here is the section I'm referring to, from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. Quote:About m and g RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - RenegadeHealer - 20-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - pfeaster - 20-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - MarcoP - 20-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - tavie - 20-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - Koen G - 20-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - ReneZ - 21-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - ReneZ - 21-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - MarcoP - 21-10-2024 RE: Thoughts on [m, g] as [in, ain]? (Stolfi) - pfeaster - 21-10-2024 |