![]() |
|
q as waw? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: q as waw? (/thread-777.html) |
q as waw? - Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016 So, slightly off-beat theory here, but hear me out. 1) The character q almost always occurs at the beginning of a word. 2) It seems to have a grammatical rather than sound function. 3) If it has a sound, then that sound occurs nowhere else in Voynich words. We can unite these points by proposing that q derives from Arabic waw. In Arabic, the conjunction 'and' is written with the letter waw joined to the beginning of a word. The conjunction 'and' was borrowed into several languages, notably Persian and Turkish, but also others due to the influence of Arabic. But the sound itself, often taken as /v/ rather than /w/, may have either been missing from the host language or not expressed in the same way (even today the sound /v/ is often found in loanwords in Turkish). Thus we could be dealing with a language and script which borrowed this way of writing 'and' from Arabic. The best part is that the characters even look similar: Voynich: q Arabic waw: Bonus! Straight waw used for Tatar:
RE: q as waw? - ThomasCoon - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - Koen G - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - ThomasCoon - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - Koen G - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - -JKP- - 25-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - ThomasCoon - 26-09-2016 RE: q as waw? - Koen G - 26-09-2016 |