![]() |
|
ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. (/thread-809.html) |
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 15-09-2018 Previously, it was suggested (it seems it was JKP) that EVA-u is a hybrid of EVA-a & n. Such an intergrowth of neighboring symbols was often, especially when cursive Gothic. But the proposed example makes you think. What do you see in the red rectangle? I do not identify here EVA -l You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. . EVA-u is explicitly written here, and "i" is added to it. But why is "i" tied to the upper tail "u", and not written after "u"? RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - nablator - 15-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - nablator - 15-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 15-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - nablator - 17-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 17-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - nablator - 17-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 17-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - farmerjohn - 17-09-2018 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 17-09-2018 |