![]() |
|
f17r - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: f17r (/thread-498.html) |
RE: f17r - -JKP- - 04-10-2018 (04-10-2018, 05:30 AM)Pelling-as-quoted-by-Diane wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Looking more closely at the first word, there's a fine horizontal bar through the (later alteration) 'a', indicating that its second letter could well have originally been 'e' - making the whole word probably "meilhor" (presumably in a Romance language, derived from the Latin melior as in 'ameliorate'). I don't think it's a horizontal bar or a later alteration. I think it's a double-chamber/double-story "a" with a slight pen skip. In the late 14th century and 15th century, many scribes used both forms, sometimes alternating randomly between them in the same word or adjacent words. I have You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. about this with visual examples. It was not uncommon for the double-chamber "a" to be written taller than other lowercase letters (as can be seen from the posted examples). Quote:Diane: The script is not peculiarly Germanic. Gothic book and Gothic cursive were used all over the continent and to some extent in England (Anglicana, a variant of Gothic was widely used in England). But the words themselves, on lines 1 and 4, are peculiarly Germanic. Especially the last phrase on line 4—it is most definitely Germanic, and almost readable as German. RE: f17r - -JKP- - 04-10-2018 RE: f17r - -JKP- - 04-10-2018 RE: f17r - Diane - 05-10-2018 RE: f17r - Koen G - 05-10-2018 RE: f17r - -JKP- - 06-10-2018 RE: f17r - Diane - 10-10-2018 RE: f17r - Koen G - 10-10-2018 RE: f17r - Paris - 10-10-2018 RE: f17r - ReneZ - 10-10-2018 |