![]() |
|
The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: The Impossibility of Double Gallows (/thread-129.html) |
RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - crezac - 31-01-2016 Hypothetically assume the script encodes English words since my vocabulary is largest in English. Further assume that the gallows characters are combinations of an L and a vowel or an I and a vowel or consonant. In effect the gallows character means I don't have to dot my i and if I make an upstroke I can get back to the written line while writing the next character. While words like lilacs and lilies aren't common in English they would generate double gallows. Just because they aren't statistically significant doesn't make an anomaly an error. RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Davidsch - 07-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Koen G - 07-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - crezac - 09-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Koen G - 09-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Anton - 10-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - crezac - 12-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Koen G - 12-03-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - farmerjohn - 26-10-2016 RE: The Impossibility of Double Gallows - Anton - 26-10-2016 |