+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters (/thread-141.html)
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - Anton - 28-02-2016
Thx Sam, did not know that. It's strange that Guy did not decompose EVA d.
I agree that j might be more approprate than z.
Notwithstanding the curious examples above in this thread, the absence of a standalone vertical is something strange. If certain glyphs can be decomposed into vertical + something, then why vertical can not stand alone?
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - ReneZ - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - Davidsch - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - Torsten - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - Anton - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - -JKP- - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - Torsten - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - -JKP- - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - Torsten - 29-02-2016
RE: Decomposition of the "gallows" characters - -JKP- - 29-02-2016