![]() |
|
[split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Imagery (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-43.html) +--- Thread: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? (/thread-1503.html) |
RE: Medieval nymph tendencies - davidjackson - 06-02-2017 Well, yes Koen. That's sort of the point - elaborately illuminated manuscripts were labour intensive and commissioned by rich clients. Much the same today with expensive coffee books and the like - they're more expensive and get looked after more than the latest Jefferey Archer. But the VMS is hardly in that sort of category. RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Koen G - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Anton - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Koen G - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - davidjackson - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Anton - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - davidjackson - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Anton - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Koen G - 06-02-2017 RE: [split] Could the manuscript be a copy of older documents? - Anton - 06-02-2017 |