(16-10-2017, 04:32 PM)Koen Gh. wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't get this. So you take some frequently mentioned facts about the manuscript, phrase them in a way that makes little sense and call them your theorems? 

(16-10-2017, 06:54 PM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.For the sake of clarity it would be good if, when publishing proposed theorems, you make a note of whether they are simply proposals (which you do not know yet how to prove or whether they can be proved at all) or they have been already proved but you prefer to not disclose the proof yet.
..
,Davidsch, I'm afraid I don't get your point neither. This forum is a discussion board, so if you'd like to post something but would not like that to be discussed, this forum probably is not the optimal place for that - not because you are not welcome to post Voynich considerations, but because we can't (and have no reasons to) prohibit those being discussed by others.

Quote:Anton
..
There is no such rule that you cannot post your "theorems" here, neither you are obliged to prove them or call them whatsoever. One can call a horse a cat
..

Quote:Anton 
... that only looks strange and not very appropriate in a structured discussion. May it be possible that you do not understand what a "theorem" is? A theorem is a statement to be proved based on logically preceding statements, be that other theorems or postulates (axioms). So when one calls something a "theorem", the first and natural question is whether the statement has been proved or has been not.

Quote:Anton...
This was not "telling" but "asking", and was clearly intended to ask you to clarify your posting (which you opted not to do), not to "shut up". Please don't distort others' messages, this is unethical at least.