![]() |
|
Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) (/thread-2668.html) |
RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - nablator - 06-03-2019 (06-03-2019, 02:33 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are two ways Voynichese is positional... the groupings of glyph combinations, and where they can occur in a token.The first goes very well with the natural idea of a 'verbose' cipher with homophones and nulls, the second not really. One way to resolve the apparent contradiction is to have the same glyph play different roles, just like the Latin con-, -us abbreviation, but that still restricts severely the possibilities. RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - geoffreycaveney - 06-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - Emma May Smith - 06-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - ReneZ - 07-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - Anton - 07-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - Antonio García Jiménez - 08-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - Emma May Smith - 09-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - ReneZ - 09-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - Emma May Smith - 09-03-2019 RE: Bigram = phoneme theory (language agnostic) - DONJCH - 10-03-2019 |