![]() |
|
[split] On the validation of Theories - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: [split] On the validation of Theories (/thread-2886.html) |
RE: Unconventional Methods in Voynich Manuscript Analysis - DONJCH - 13-08-2019 (12-08-2019, 04:49 PM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Usually a theory gets validated. For instance it is necessary that a theory is consistent in itself and with the known facts. A theory must also be falsifiable. With other words there must be statements that can disprove the theory. See the following link for more validation criteria: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. If there is one theory that stands out as being most likely, I reckon it's probably the Torsten Timm autocopy theory. On another note, Reference 2, so much space devoted to the Cheshire theory?
RE: Unconventional Methods in Voynich Manuscript Analysis - nickpelling - 13-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - ReneZ - 13-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - davidjackson - 13-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - ReneZ - 14-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - Torsten - 14-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - ReneZ - 14-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - Torsten - 14-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - davidjackson - 15-08-2019 RE: [split] On the validation of Theories - Torsten - 15-08-2019 |