+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? (/thread-3064.html)
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - Helmut Winkler - 25-01-2020
(25-01-2020, 12:00 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Ah, OK thanks.
Yes, it is entirely reasonable that this would be the last 'original' entry in the MS.
There aren't many entries in the MS that can be called 'later' with any confidence.
I think these few cases are:
- the quire marks. logically, these would only be added after the MS was completed and ready for binding.
- the month names in the zodiac area.
- the folio numbers
- much more recent annotations that seem to be in pencil: 'a' 'b' and 'c' above some of the cosmological pages
- the cover and anything written on it
I think you are right with (maybe) the exception of the zodiac month names, I would put them nearer to the middle of the 15th c., not that it matters much
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - Koen G - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - Helmut Winkler - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - bi3mw - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - -JKP- - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - -JKP- - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - Koen G - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - davidjackson - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - Paris - 25-01-2020
RE: Which things in the manuscript can be dated? - Anton - 25-01-2020