+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Is [a] always [a]? (/thread-3146.html)
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - Koen G - 06-04-2020
Thanks, Marco!
Yes, you are right. Actually I am mixing two problems. My main motivation for making this thread was your point (2). I rather wonder if the [a] followed by [i] is not the form VM minims take in certain contexts. So [ai] could be like "m" or "n". If the first minim takes a leading serif, it would explain why there is always a (pseudo?) [a] before [i].
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - LisaFaginDavis - 06-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - -JKP- - 06-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - MarcoP - 06-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - RenegadeHealer - 06-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - Aga Tentakulus - 07-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - ReneZ - 07-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - Aga Tentakulus - 07-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - MarcoP - 07-04-2020
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - ReneZ - 07-04-2020