+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: The Constructed Language Hypothesis (/thread-4226.html)
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - ReneZ - 02-04-2024
(02-04-2024, 10:50 AM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Do you count the presence of null text within your idea of a meaningful solution?
Null text is strictly a cipher thing.
In the context of a constructed language, there is no place for nulls.
Or at least, it would not make any particular sense.
Now, in the frame of my question about a word-by-word substitution:
*if* a word-by-word translation can be ruled out on some basis (that we do not yet have),
then, the text could still be meaningful, if:
- there is a verbose substitution
- the person(s) doing the text conversion had some degree of freedom (which would really explain quite a lot!)
A verbose substitution and some degree of freedom would both arise if the person(s) doing the text conversion was using nulls.
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - MarcoP - 02-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - Torsten - 02-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - cvetkakocj@rogers.com - 03-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - Koen G - 03-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - nablator - 03-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - merrimacga - 03-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - nablator - 03-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - Hermes777 - 03-04-2024
RE: The Constructed Language Hypothesis - Hermes777 - 03-04-2024