![]() |
|
What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? (/thread-4329.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? - nablator - 25-07-2024 (25-07-2024, 10:40 AM)Ruby Novacna wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(24-07-2024, 09:45 PM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This one looks like the abbreviation for Item in a Latin or French manuscript: every line starts with Item in a table of contents. Without the I of Item, yes, of course. In paragraphs, k at the beginning of a line is much more frequent on the first line of the paragraph. In the ZL transliteration: 77 ",.P.*<\%>k" 26 ",.P.* +k" Almost 3:1 in favor of the first line. RE: What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? - joben - 25-07-2024 RE: What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? - Bluetoes101 - 25-07-2024 RE: What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? - Ruby Novacna - 25-07-2024 RE: What if the Voynich Manuscript is Actually Old French (1000-1400)? - Bluetoes101 - 25-07-2024 |