+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Extended EVA &163 (/thread-475.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Extended EVA &163 - Koen G - 18-03-2016
I find it so weird that people can defend abolishing assumptions - rightfully so! - and then, in the same paragraph, demand that others accept the oldest and most mistaken assumption of them all: that all medieval manuscripts were original works, and that no older texts were copied or translated.
Imagine looking at a painting made in 1855. The painting depicts the roman Colosseum. Does that mean we have to analyse the architectural properties of the depicted building through a 1855 lens?
RE: Extended EVA &163 - Anton - 18-03-2016
RE: Extended EVA &163 - -JKP- - 18-03-2016
RE: Extended EVA &163 - Diane - 18-03-2016
RE: Extended EVA &163 - Helmut Winkler - 19-03-2016
RE: Extended EVA &163 - Sam G - 19-03-2016