+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: [split] Word length autocorrelation (/thread-4910.html)
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - quimqu - 05-09-2025
(05-09-2025, 05:51 PM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(05-09-2025, 05:19 PM)quimqu wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But doing line by line as I did, its mean is negative (about -0.07).
I get 0.169 for word bigrams all in the same line (positive-negative)/(positive+negative). I used all the lines (including labels) of the old Takahashi transliteration (ivtff_v0a).
No, what I did is entire words. The goal is to see if one word after the other has the form [short-long-short] or [short-short] / [long-long]
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - nablator - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - quimqu - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - nablator - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - Jorge_Stolfi - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - quimqu - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - RobGea - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - quimqu - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - quimqu - 05-09-2025
RE: [split] Word length autocorrelation - Jorge_Stolfi - 05-09-2025