![]() |
|
Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? (/thread-5111.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? - Torsten - 07-12-2025 (07-12-2025, 09:35 AM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hello again all! The Network Perspective on Voynich Word Structure Your observation about a word structure aligns with documented positional constraints (prefixes like <qok->, middles like <ee>, and endings like <aiin> or <dy>). However, there's a complementary perspective that reveals deeper organizational principles: viewing Voynich words as nodes in a highly interconnected similarity network. Rather than words being constructed from strict positional slots, the Voynich manuscript exhibits a continuous web of similarity relationships with remarkable properties: Exceptional Connectivity: Network analysis shows that 84.67% of all Voynich words (6,796 out of 8,026) connect through single-glyph differences—what I call an "edit distance of 1." The longest path through this network spans 21 steps, demonstrating how thoroughly interconnected the vocabulary is (see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.). Spatial Clustering: Words that are structurally similar tend to appear close together in the manuscript. As Figure 4 in our paper demonstrates, the average string distance between tokens increases with line distance—meaning similar words cluster on the same pages and even within nearby lines, creating localized families of related forms. The network perspective explains several features that a rigid 3-slot framework doesn't fully capture:
Positional constraints certainly exist (certain glyphs strongly prefer word-initial or word-final positions), but the network view reveals the generative process: variants spawn from variants through incremental modifications, creating a similarity web where words are related neighbors rather than independent slot combinations. The network approach describes Voynich words less as "slot-filling" and more as organic growth through variation—each new word emerges from existing forms through small transformations, maintaining family resemblances while exploring the allowable glyph-sequence space. A gephi project for the complete Voynich network is available at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. RE: Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? - collaredwolfhound - 11-12-2025 RE: Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? - JoJo_Jost - 11-12-2025 |