![]() |
|
Just a hoax? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: Just a hoax? (/thread-5230.html) |
RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 (13-01-2026, 12:20 PM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The language grammar used in the Rohonc Codex is loose. For me it is actually quite similar to a pidgin. It looks ugly. But the sentences make sense, make patterns and make a consistent story which agrees with the Bible. So it was most probably grammatical for the author. I see! But could it be just a yet unidentified natural language? Are there identifiable grammatical rules? Like, SVO (subject-verb-object) or SOV order, articles, prepositions ("of", "to", "at", "in", ...), explicit word for "and", pronouns? Since the writing is ideographic, I suppose that there are no inflections or declensions, no identifiable gender and number, right? All the best, --stolfi RE: Just a hoax? - dashstofsk - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Rafal - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - Jorge_Stolfi - 13-01-2026 RE: Just a hoax? - JoJo_Jost - 13-01-2026 |