+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! (/thread-5710.html)
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 04-05-2026
(04-05-2026, 07:12 PM)rikforto wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(04-05-2026, 03:43 PM)Labyrinthinesecurity wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My badthanks for the correctoon
I am going to note that this is not an answer to the question, "Where did you get this (wrong) information from?", which I think some people might want the answer to before a lot of energy is sunk into evaluating this analysis
All my scripts use the accurate A B distribution except the morphometrics one which uses a very early sketchy approximation by mistake, but wait for tomorrows detailed results before investing energy
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - eggyk - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - eggyk - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Jorge_Stolfi - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - DG97EEB - 04-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - oshfdk - 05-05-2026