+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. (/thread-809.html)
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 03-10-2016
Example 16 further aspect of interest. Here it is necessary to compare the right foot first bench and left leg of the second bench. Regular transformation of the left leg in the blot (dot) with a decrease in the vertical dimension type. If it is the spoiled "c", then why specifically it the left foot regularly turns into blot (Figure 18, 19, 20, 21) while the right leg only 2-3 case (Figure 23) (excluding the codes 149, 150 extended EVA ) and also at from decrease of the vertical dimension type?
It seems, even the opposite, that the author (in some cases) expressly adds ink when the second pass at writing order to "point" and "c" were different.
Also it is necessary take into account the existence of the code 158 (extended EVA), Fig. 22.
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 03-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 03-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 05-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Sam G - 05-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 05-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 10-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 11-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - sidanno - 11-10-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 12-10-2016