+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: 116v (/thread-437.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
RE: 116v - Anton - 29-03-2017
I had an idea recently that we could advance to some success in the following way - we write down the possible variants and then see which combinations thereof form a valid grammatical phrase together. For example "multos" is a word form, likewise "te" is also a word form (ablative or accusative, if I remember correctly). Those various word forms should form the puzzle together consistently. In other words, these words should be analyzed not isolated, but in a single grammatical context.
RE: 116v - Searcher - 29-03-2017
RE: 116v - -JKP- - 30-03-2017
RE: 116v - -JKP- - 22-07-2017
RE: 116v - Davidsch - 03-10-2017
RE: 116v - Hubert Dale - 19-10-2017
RE: 116v - Paris - 19-10-2017
RE: 116v - Anton - 19-10-2017
RE: 116v - Hubert Dale - 19-10-2017
RE: 116v - Anton - 19-10-2017