![]() |
|
[split] Commissioned or not? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: [split] Commissioned or not? (/thread-2446.html) |
RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - Koen G - 31-07-2018 The hands in the MS are more complex than A vs B, but does the evidence really point towards one individual sliding from one end towards the other? It's not impossible, but I think the belief in a single author who did the whole thing might weigh on your judgement there. If there are two or more distinct hands in a MS, wouldn't the majority of cases be attributed to two or more writers? About corrections: it's important to understand how mistakes were made. Scribing was a tedious process - especially copying or transcribing as in your example. The mere mechanic nature of the activity would cause errors like skipping a piece of a line or one or more complete lines. For example, it happens a lot that a few lines are omitted because the copyist's eye skipped to a lower line starting with the same word. Corrections would be present if the scribe understood the text and was able to spot his mistake easily when rereading. A lack of corrections might just mean that the scribes were unable to understand what they were copying. Or a neutral explanation, maybe they didn't care enough to correct every tiny mistake. Or maybe they took great care not to make any. RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - -JKP- - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - Helmut Winkler - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - ReneZ - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - davidjackson - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - Helmut Winkler - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - -JKP- - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - Torsten - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - -JKP- - 01-08-2018 RE: [split] Commissioned or not? - VViews - 02-08-2018 |