![]() |
|
The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Library and Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-35.html) +--- Forum: Codicology and Paleography (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-48.html) +--- Thread: The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? (/thread-2603.html) |
RE: The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? - Beatrice - 01-01-2019 You are right. I haven't seen as many mss as you. Just enough of them with a palaeographer to say that any graph can have different variants. It is not the quantity of the manuscripts we have seen but the quality of the search. It is like trying to find a microscopic needle not in a haystack but in thousands haystacks. So this does not consist of who has read more. Nihil novum sub sole. RE: The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? - -JKP- - 02-01-2019 RE: The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? - LisaFaginDavis - 22-03-2020 RE: The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? - Helmut Winkler - 22-03-2020 RE: The first palaeographers to assert the Ms is in a humanist script? - LisaFaginDavis - 22-03-2020 |