![]() |
|
Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? (/thread-3107.html) |
RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - -JKP- - 23-02-2020 davidjackson wrote: Why are you multiplying %red and %quasi by 100? 66 occurrences in a corpus of 6347 is 0.0139%, not 1.04%. 66 out of 6347 is definitely 1.04%. You can get a close approximation by moving the decimal 2 steps to the left (63.47). So without even doing the math, it's possible to see that 63 is almost the same as 66 (almost 1 to 1), which means it's going to calculate out to about 1% after you move the decimal back to its original position. It's a simple way to do a quick check in your head. RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - Koen G - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - ReneZ - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - davidjackson - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - -JKP- - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - Koen G - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - DONJCH - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - -JKP- - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - Koen G - 23-02-2020 RE: Are perfect-reduplication and quasi-reduplication related? - -JKP- - 23-02-2020 |