![]() |
|
[split] Implications of multiple scribes - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: [split] Implications of multiple scribes (/thread-3192.html) |
RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - Aga Tentakulus - 09-05-2020 That there were 2 people in the VM was always clear. I thought a 3 person was quite possible. 5 persons was a surprise. Families with 6-10 children was not uncommon around 1400. Rather the normality. Many children were considered as security for the age. Something like a pension plan. My grandfather also had 6 siblings = 7 children. According to the motto, is a doctor, so all doctors only the youngest goes to church. Reading something about history gives you a better overview, and it does not hurt. RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - Emma May Smith - 09-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - R. Sale - 09-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - RobGea - 09-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - Mark Knowles - 10-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - Mark Knowles - 10-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - Mark Knowles - 10-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - -JKP- - 11-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - DONJCH - 11-05-2020 RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - LisaFaginDavis - 11-05-2020 |