![]() |
|
Time to retire Currier languages? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Time to retire Currier languages? (/thread-3610.html) |
RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - bi3mw - 27-07-2021 (27-07-2021, 04:51 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The folios of the manuscript are known to have been shuffled out of their original order.While it is true that some folios may not be sorted correctly, I would not go so far as to assume that the VMS was bound completely "jumbled". (27-07-2021, 05:00 PM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This may be explained away by the tedious work being distributed across a number of scribes working in parallel.Even with parallel editing, I would assume that the writers edited individual blocks, otherwise it would hardly have been possible to work in an orderly manner. In addition, the tasks for the individual writers would then have been distributed more evenly. RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - Helmut Winkler - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - Helmut Winkler - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - MarcoP - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - Scarecrow - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - Anton - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - Emma May Smith - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - nickpelling - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - nickpelling - 27-07-2021 RE: Time to retire Currier languages? - nablator - 28-07-2021 |