![]() |
|
Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? (/thread-4086.html) |
RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - Koen G - 10-10-2023 That's a very clear example! Do you think this is the same for all scribes? I'm also wondering now.. would scribes in regular manuscripts write the numeral 8 in the same 2-stroke fashion? If c+loop is a common method, this probably means that it's convenient to write 8 like this with a quill on parchment (which does not behave like pen on paper). However, if it turns out that 8 was rarely written like this, the implication would be that all Voynich scribes (re)-learned how to write it in a way that was more consistent with the apparent philosophy behind the glyph set. RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - nablator - 10-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - bi3mw - 10-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - nablator - 10-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - pfeaster - 10-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - zobowiazanie - 10-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - nablator - 10-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - Koen G - 11-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - Aga Tentakulus - 11-10-2023 RE: Experiment: how would you transliterate the following glyphs? - Hider - 12-10-2023 |