+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B (/thread-6112.html)
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - ololololo - 26-09-2026
(26-09-2026, 05:20 PM)RadioFM wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The fact of the matter is there's no apparent grammar in Voynichese, the prefix-suffixes rules are haphazardly ignored every now and then, and AFAIK it's the only manuscript of its time (that we know of) that would've used such an unusual/anachronistic cipher to encode a whole book. Matching plants and labels have yielded basically nothing in terms of decipherment.In my opinion, these are just speculations without a clear and coherent conclusion.
Although it could be a cipher or a conlang, there's kind of enough evidence that points to gibberish as well.
I think it’s the "Voynich curse" — the manuscript could well be anything you can imagine.
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - MarcoP - 26-09-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - Jorge_Stolfi - 26-09-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - npcompl33t - 26-09-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - Jorge_Stolfi - 27-09-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - npcompl33t - 27-09-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - MarcoP - 28-09-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - MarcoP - 02-10-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - takrobat - 02-10-2026
RE: Evidence for 2 rules linking words in Herbal A->B - npcompl33t - 05-10-2026