The Voynich Ninja
[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Printable Version

+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov (/thread-632.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Searcher - 11-07-2016

(11-07-2016, 01:18 PM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Quote:Does it make sense if aror sheey is a part of the sentence in the first person (I do, I will etc.)?

Technically it does, but in such case it is not clear why would the author encrypt this portion. In my blog post, I suggested some options which could explain encryption:

Quote:
  • quantitative characteristic, like “three times” or “seven days”;
  • qualitative modus operandi, like “wear on the neck”;
  • name of the disease, like “against delirium tremens”.

Quote:Could valden or valten  be interpreted as walten?

I posed the same question You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. I think that deserves attention, although in that case we would again have the reverse order of words, like "<this object> rule over" instead of "rule over <this object>".

Thanks. 
I'm also interested how this part of the sentence might be translated in the case of "valden"="walten".
"walten ubren (oberen) so nimm gâs mich"


RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - ThomasCoon - 11-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Searcher - 11-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Searcher - 11-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Anton - 11-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - ThomasCoon - 11-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Searcher - 11-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - ThomasCoon - 12-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - ReneZ - 12-07-2016

Register or login to view the content



RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - Anton - 12-07-2016

Register or login to view the content