+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Imagery (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-43.html)
+--- Thread: J. Janick interpretations of the VMS... (/thread-1451.html)
RE: J. Janick interpretations of the VMS... - ReneZ - 13-01-2017
(13-01-2017, 08:32 PM)davidjackson wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Quote:The original publication was in a journal ('Herbalgram') which I presume is peer-reviewed.
From their You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.:
Quote:[deleted]
How could this journal peer-review a historic comparison of medievalia? It's a modern day botanic journal, they have zero expertise in this field.
David, don't take this personally. You could be right. But your response exactly hits the problem that I see.
They should have this expertise and probably do.
How can we judge / who are you to judge?
They should (would) have asked for review by people with relevant expertise.
RE: J. Janick interpretations of the VMS... - davidjackson - 13-01-2017
RE: J. Janick interpretations of the VMS... - ReneZ - 13-01-2017
RE: J. Janick interpretations of the VMS... - davidjackson - 13-01-2017