+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion (/thread-2100.html)
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - Torsten - 17-09-2017
(17-09-2017, 10:15 PM)davidjackson wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Quote:For instance the [q]-glyph is in 99,5% the first glyph in a glyph group and is followed in 97 % by an [o]-glyph.
OK, the first part of the statement doesn't make sense because 99,5% of words in the corpus aren't [q] AFAIK.
What I mean is that for glyph groups containing the [q]-glyph the [q]-glyph is used in 99,5% of the cases as first glyph.
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - davidjackson - 17-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - Torsten - 18-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - MarcoP - 18-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - Davidsch - 18-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - Anton - 18-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - Koen G - 18-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - ReneZ - 18-09-2017
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - Anton - 18-09-2017