![]() |
|
f67r1 and the supposed constellations - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Astrology & Astronomy (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-34.html) +--- Thread: f67r1 and the supposed constellations (/thread-3190.html) |
RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - ReneZ - 15-07-2020 (14-07-2020, 05:38 PM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Construct a set of vords of the size N=12, such that one, and only one, vord of the set occurs in each of these folios. A member of the set can be repeatable in a folio, but two or more members shall not coexist within a folio. That's a very interesting idea, but obviously there are a few catches. The zodiac names could be abbreviated in different ways, for example. Worse, if the 'encryption' method is verbose, this will not work at all..... Finally, I am not that sure that any herbals from the same time frame mention one zodiac sign in each of their descriptions / recipes.... RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - RobGea - 15-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - R. Sale - 15-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - Anton - 15-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - Anton - 15-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - Anton - 15-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - RobGea - 15-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - Linda - 16-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - DONJCH - 16-07-2020 RE: f67r1 and the supposed constellations - Pardis Motiee - 01-05-2021 |