![]() |
|
[split] Verbose cipher? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: [split] Verbose cipher? (/thread-3356.html) |
RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - geoffreycaveney - 18-09-2020 Here is an example of what my You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. looks like for a short passage of actual Voynich ms text. The following text comprises the four lines at the top of ms page f67r1, transcribed to represent a modified form of Koen's verbose cipher as I interpreted and adjusted it: [p]égo r'ey ePálgy hro ypéhey r'ey ePo ho kál degy neté[y] ral hepegy béy téy tey téga yjeh r hé[y] jehr o derhe al á r'ér kao ká jego aetéy ral ál rhal jéy kál p'ey I find the "floating" EVA [o]'s (not part of one of the [o+glyph] bigrams) interesting when represented as <h>'s, as the VCI transcription does. I also must note that it is very likely that this transcription system, like others, is oversimplifying the characters transcribed as EVA "[sh]", and here transcribed as <r'>. I strongly suspect this actually represents multiple letters, depending on whether the loop on top is open, closed, or perhaps a third form. I also note that EVA "[d]" may actually represent multiple forms and letters as well, so its transcription here as <k> (and of EVA [od] as <g>), may also be an oversimplification. The VCI transcription system currently lacks such values as <c>, <č>, and <x> (the voiceless velar fricative phoneme), so they may well be among the other actual values of different forms of EVA [sh] and EVA [d]. Geoffrey RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - Koen G - 18-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - MichelleL11 - 18-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - geoffreycaveney - 18-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - Koen G - 18-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - Anton - 18-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - RenegadeHealer - 19-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - DONJCH - 19-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - MarcoP - 19-09-2020 RE: [split] Verbose cipher? - nablator - 19-09-2020 |