![]() |
|
Why not positional variation? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Why not positional variation? (/thread-4361.html) |
RE: Why not positional variation? - Aga Tentakulus - 17-04-2025 Have nothing in common. One is a combination, the other an ending. As far as can be recognised with the spelling EVA. RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 17-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - Mauro - 17-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - Stefan Wirtz_2 - 18-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 18-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - Stefan Wirtz_2 - 18-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 19-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - ReneZ - 19-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 19-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - ReneZ - 19-04-2025 |