![]() |
|
Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript (/thread-4834.html) |
RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - quimqu - 22-08-2025 (22-08-2025, 08:42 AM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(22-08-2025, 07:53 AM)quimqu wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The null hypothesisis is: You’re right that the null hypothesis is problematic for languages, because both languages and topics are defined from the same textual features (word frequencies, symbol patterns,..). That means independence is impossible by construction, so I agree that the p-value wouldn’t really have a valid interpretation. For the scribal hands, it’s different: hands are identified from handwriting features, not from lexical distributions (if I am not wrong). So here the null hypothesis (that topics are independent of hands) makes sense, even if some correlation between hands and languages is already known. RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - Mauro - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - quimqu - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - magnesium - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - quimqu - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - quimqu - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - magnesium - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - oshfdk - 22-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - quimqu - 23-08-2025 RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - obelus - 24-08-2025 |