+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: f17r (/thread-498.html)
RE: f17r - davidjackson - 28-03-2016
Quote: Scribes in the 1400s were constantly tossing in Latin terms mixed with their own language. Even in the 1700s, when books were printed in mass quantity for a broader audience, Latin and Greek phrases were intermixed with the language in which the book was written (French, English, German, Italian, etc.) without a footnote to translate it. The fact that there were no footnotes indicates that they assumed the reader could read the Latin and Greek phrases without explanation.
Yes, but that's a different case. It was assumed a literate reader could understand the classical languages. I'm talking about mixing vernaculars for a personal case.
Quote: About the "luco", my Spanish is not perfect, but this root can also be used in a verb, meaning something like "appear, look like", probably etymologically related to "lux". Any possibilities there?
Luco is an obsolete word meaning "grove" (or copse). I think you're confusing it with lucir , to shine (and it has all the connotations the English verb does as well), from the Latin lucere (according to Rae). I can't think of any others.
Quote: Perhaps, "mallior" could be a valid word form of "malo"?Doubt it. It is more likely to be an old spelling of mayor, "greatest" or "oldest", etc etc- ll and y were often confused. Or even mejor, "better", although then i would expect mehor.
RE: f17r - MarcoP - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - Anton - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - Anton - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - Davidsch - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - -JKP- - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - Anton - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - Koen G - 28-03-2016
RE: f17r - -JKP- - 29-03-2016
RE: f17r - Anton - 29-03-2016