+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited (/thread-5153.html)
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - ReneZ - 21-12-2025
I have quite a lot of data on this, which I have started to summarise, but this is still far from ready to publish. I can say with confidence that it is not a matter of spelling change. I am also reasonably sure that it can at some point be explained with a few 'rules'. But I haven't found them yet.
What it looks like most to me, is that all frequent A words continue to be used in B, but there is a whole set of new words. This causes a shift in frequencies of these frequent A words of course.
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - Bernd - 21-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - obelus - 21-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - bi3mw - 21-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - kckluge - 21-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - quimqu - 21-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - kckluge - 22-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - MarcoP - 22-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - Jorge_Stolfi - 22-12-2025
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - oshfdk - 22-12-2025