![]() |
|
Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! (/thread-5710.html) |
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 (05-05-2026, 01:41 PM)rikforto wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I have been too much of a hater recently, so I will say something nice about machine learning: It has certainly allowed people to post results to this forum You deserve a thank you for keeping polite, even if ML is clearly not your thing and your consideration for ML practioners is visibly quite low
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - dashstofsk - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - ReneZ - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Grove - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Grove - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Grove - 05-05-2026 |