![]() |
|
Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? (/thread-2394.html) |
RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - Koen G - 13-06-2018 Thanks Marco! That's a good bench indeed. I had somehow expected them to pop off the page at me but it was pretty hard to "scan" this text. Some characters in this MS do look like the small -is abbreviations could have given rise to the "capital versions" gallows K and T. It is well illustrated by these two. You just have to connect the left loop on the bottom one to get EVA-t. By the way, how would you transcribe the second line with the "cis.non at' de illi" at the end? RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - -JKP- - 13-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - MarcoP - 13-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - Koen G - 13-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - Wladimir D - 14-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - MarcoP - 14-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - -JKP- - 14-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - MarcoP - 14-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - -JKP- - 14-06-2018 RE: Which other manuscript contain the most Voynichese glyphs? - Davidsch - 14-06-2018 |