![]() |
|
Why not positional variation? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Why not positional variation? (/thread-4361.html) |
RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 19-04-2025 (19-04-2025, 01:08 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.unless you consider language-dependence, i.e. some words appearing more in A and others more in B. I have considered the languages A and B separately. The tables of statistics that I have presented in this thread are for the separate languages. I believe that the split between A and B is significant and that each needs to be examined separately. Statistics applied to the whole of the manuscript are sometimes biased towards A or B ( e.g. distribution of daiin ). If the issue is why there is an A/B split then I have already proposed a scenario for this in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 19-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 19-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - Mauro - 19-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 20-04-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - extent_of_foxes - 10-05-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - nablator - 10-05-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - extent_of_foxes - 11-05-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - dashstofsk - 11-05-2025 RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 11-05-2025 |