(24-04-2026, 09:14 AM)JoJo_Jost wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@oeesordy:

On the entropy point: I've tested that against actual MHD corpora. "Ortloff von Baierland" shows 75.4% Levenshtein-1 connectivity, "Breslauer Arzneibuch" 72.8% — basically the same range Timm claimed was unique to artificial text.

So "low entropy / many word repetitions" isn't diagnostic of a hoax - it's what you get with german medieval medical texts in general.

As for the conlang-from-substitution idea: that would require an author inventing a language with consistent morphology and syntax. A medieval scribe around 1430? That seems rather unlikely.

And I don’t want to discuss modern forgery theory in this thread, because that’s a completely different topic and would distract too much from the actual subject… I ask for your understanding.