The Voynich Ninja
Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Printable Version

+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! (/thread-5710.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026

(05-05-2026, 04:14 PM)Grove wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Isn’t that cho mapped to A opposite of what you said here:

all traditionally classified as Currier A because they fall in the f1-f57 range. But their text is E-dominant, and their plant illustrations show B-type features (daisies, grass, root platforms, unidirectional leaves). Conversely, f87r, f90r, f93v, and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are traditionally Currier B, but their text is O-dominant and their plants show A-type features (stem-root lines, A-type flowers and calyxes).

Isn’t that cho mapped to A opposite of what you said here:

all traditionally classified as Currier A because they fall in the f1-f57 range. But their text is E-dominant, and their plant illustrations show B-type features (daisies, grass, root platforms, unidirectional leaves). Conversely, f87r, f90r, f93v, and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are traditionally Currier B, but their text is O-dominant and their plants show A-type features (stem-root lines, A-type flowers and calyxes).

Ahh, I see I misunderstood gut have misread that. So che dominant is your B and che is A.

Che dominant means B. (Che isnt A).

The mnemonic: A goes with cho (the default/dominant form), B goes with che (the alternative).


RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - dashstofsk - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 06-05-2026

Register or login to view the content



RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 21-05-2026

Register or login to view the content