![]() |
|
Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! (/thread-5710.html) |
RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 (05-05-2026, 04:14 PM)Grove wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Isn’t that cho mapped to A opposite of what you said here: Che dominant means B. (Che isnt A). The mnemonic: A goes with cho (the default/dominant form), B goes with che (the alternative). RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - dashstofsk - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - nablator - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 05-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 06-05-2026 RE: Currier A/B split is not what we thought it was! - Labyrinthinesecurity - 21-05-2026 |