![]() |
|
The "gallows" characters - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: The "gallows" characters (/thread-70.html) |
RE: The "gallows" characters - Davidsch - 26-02-2016 Thank you -Job- >>You seem to be completely misinterpreting the results i posted. I agree. But that is the reason i asked for explanation. I still do not understand what you mean, i apologize for that. You write: " higher character replaceability values" " valid substitutions " Can you give an example of a replacement, what is valid and what is invalid? RE: The "gallows" characters - Anton - 26-02-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - -Job- - 27-02-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - Davidsch - 28-02-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - -JKP- - 28-02-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - Davidsch - 29-02-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - Anton - 25-03-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - ReneZ - 26-03-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - Davidsch - 01-06-2016 RE: The "gallows" characters - Anton - 01-06-2016 |