![]() |
|
Currier A and B - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Currier A and B (/thread-120.html) |
RE: Currier A and B - nablator - 29-11-2019 (16-01-2016, 06:53 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think one problem with saying whether a label or a word occurs only in Currier A or B, is that you may not be capturing the real difference. To discriminate between Currier A and B with EVA bigrams statistics only, the following are probably the best: "ed", "hd", "lG" where G is a gallows glyph, especially "k". They are common in B, almost absent in A. Apparently there is no bigram that is common in A and almost absent in B. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. From these visual statistics there are few intermediate pages between A and B: - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. : 4 "hd", 2 "ed" - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. : first paragraph A, second paragraph B? - f58 is special: it's both intermediate between A and B and a move sideways: the frequency of "al" and "ly" is higher than on any other folio. - f88v: 3 "ed", f89r1: 3 "ed", f89r2: first paragraph has 4 "ed", last paragraph looks like "pure" A. RE: Currier A and B - Koen G - 29-11-2019 RE: Currier A and B - ReneZ - 30-11-2019 RE: Currier A and B - DONJCH - 30-11-2019 RE: Currier A and B - nablator - 11-12-2019 RE: Currier A and B - nickpelling - 12-12-2019 RE: Currier A and B - ReneZ - 12-12-2019 RE: Currier A and B - nickpelling - 12-12-2019 RE: Currier A and B - nickpelling - 13-12-2019 RE: Currier A and B - oeesordy - 30-03-2026 |