![]() |
|
I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? (/thread-2936.html) |
RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - ReneZ - 21-09-2019 One problem is the rather liberal use of the word 'cipher' and 'encryption'. Friedman did not really say that it is not a cipher. This would require a definition of 'cipher'. He did say that it looked more like an early form of synthetic language. One should certainly not call Trithemius' third book a cipher, because it is a readable cleartext from beginning to end. However, there is a hidden message. We don't have this with the Voynich MS for sure. All the examples of ciphers in medieval and early modern books are cases where some simple operation on a plaintext was made, to make it unreadable at first sight. The Voynich MS is certainly something else. RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - bi3mw - 21-09-2019 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - RenegadeHealer - 21-09-2019 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - DonaldFisk - 21-09-2019 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - VViews - 23-09-2019 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - RenegadeHealer - 23-09-2019 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - nickpelling - 24-09-2019 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - Linda - 26-08-2020 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - Pythagoras - 21-01-2021 RE: I mean, really, why would it be encrypted? - Pythagoras - 21-01-2021 |