(26-08-2026, 06:41 AM)JoJo_Jost wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Just so there are no misunderstandings here.

‘qo’ and language

‘qo’ occurs 99.6 per cent of the time at the start of a word. It does not occur elsewhere within a word.
It cannot therefore represent a natural letter, because in almost every language letters also occur within words.

‘qo’ is not independent. There is an extremely narrow sequence of glyphs: initial ‘qo’ -> ‘k’ 59.8 per cent, ‘t’ 22.3 per cent (the gallows together 82 per cent).

This makes it even less likely that it is encoded as a letter and, of course, makes ‘qo’ as a word very, very unlikely....

Just as an aside...