![]() |
|
A possible way to break down Voynich text - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: A possible way to break down Voynich text (/thread-713.html) |
RE: A possible way to break down Voynich text - ThomasCoon - 23-12-2016 (22-12-2016, 06:42 AM)stellar wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@ Coon Hi Stellar - thank you for the questions. I haven't stopped working on this (and should do more work on it), but the school year is in full-swing and time is in short supply! ![]() Regarding English or Latin: When I started working on the VMS, I made a conscious decision NOT to guess what the underlying language was. To assume a language didn't seem the right place to begin, because that assumption could color all my observations. Instead it's better to work on the code, and the underlying language would eventually become clear. Earlier I said there were 26 "units", now I'm not sure. My views have changed a little - the patterns I talk about here may only be one component in a larger encryption scheme. The word entropy would be lower using these combinations, yes. I still suspect that some spaces are contrived / at least not meaningful. Thank you for the "Great Job" - I admire your diligence and hard work also. Regarding why some glyphs equaled others: some 2-letter combinations often appeared in the same places as each other, so I wondered if they might have the same meaning. I'm not so sure anymore - that is still something to investigate. As JKP and I have discussed before, when you try to break up a string of Voynichese into units, the whole thing quickly becomes a bowl of alphabet soup. The code is very hard to grasp; the writer must have been very intelligent. RE: A possible way to break down Voynich text - A.Wilmarth - 03-08-2024 |